The Antibody Society

the official website of the antibody society

An international non-profit supporting antibody-related research and development.

  • LOG IN
  • BECOME A MEMBER
  • About
    • Mission & Activities
    • Directors and Officers
    • The Antibody Society’s Committees
      • Communication & Membership Committee
      • Meetings Committee
      • AIRR Community Working Groups & Subcommittees
    • Sponsors & Partners
  • Society meetings
    • Computational Antibody Discovery: State of the Art
      • Computational Antibody Discovery Symposium Participants
    • Harnessing Cytokines for Cancer Immunotherapy Symposium
    • Biopharmaceutical Informatics Symposium
    • Emerging Cancer Therapies Leveraging Gamma-Delta Effector T cells Symposium
    • Emerging Immunotherapeutics for Ovarian Cancer Symposium
    • AIRR Community Meetings
    • Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics (US) 2024
      • 2022 Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics
      • 2020 Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics
      • 2019 Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics
      • 2018 Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics
      • What is INN a Name?
        • INN issue updates
    • Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics Europe 2024
      • Scientific Advisors, Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics Europe
    • FOCIS Symposia
  • AIRR Community
    • AIRR News
    • AIRR Community Seminar Series
    • AIRR Publications
    • AIRR Meetings
      • AIRR Community Meeting VII – Learnings and Perspectives
      • AIRR Community Special Event 2023  – Zooming in to the Community II
      • AIRR Community Meeting VI: “Exploring New Frontiers”
      • AIRR Community Meeting V: “Zooming in to the AIRR Community”
      • AIRR Community Meeting V Pre-Meetings
        • AIRR-seq in the Pandemic
        • AIRR-seq Biological Standards and Workflows
      • AIRR Community Special Event: “Response to COVID-19”
      • AIRR Community Meeting IV: “Bridging the Gaps”
      • AIRR Community Meeting III
        • Day 1
        • Day 2
        • Day 3
        • Day 4
      • AIRR Community Meeting II
      • AIRR Community Meeting I
    • AIRR Community Working Groups
      • Biological Resources Working Group
      • Common Repository Working Group
      • Diagnostics Working Group
      • Germline Database Working Group
      • Legal and Ethics Working Group
      • Software Working Group
      • Standards Working Group
    • AIRR Community Sub-Committees
      • Communications Sub-Committee
      • Executive Sub-Committee
      • Inferred Allele Review Committee
      • Meetings Sub-Committee
      • Strategic Planning Sub-Committee
    • AIRR Data Commons
    • AIRR Community Calendar
    • AIRR Community Webinar Series
    • On AIRR – An AIRR Community Podcast
    • AIRR Community Resources
    • AIRR Community Service Prize
  • Members only
    • Login
    • Note to members
    • Member discount codes
    • 2024 Calendar of Events
    • James S. Huston Antibody Science Talent Award
      • 2022 James S. Huston Antibody Science Talent Award Recipient
      • 2021 James S. Huston Antibody Science Talent Award Recipient
      • 2020 James S. Huston Antibody Science Talent Award Recipient
      • Huston Award Criteria
    • Research Competitions
      • Research Competition Winners
    • Science Writing Competition
      • Science Writing Competition Winners
    • Imaging Competition
      • Imaging Calendar Competition winners
        • The Antibody Society 2024 Calendar
    • Antibodies in early-stage studies
    • Presentations
  • Upcoming meetings
  • Web Resources
    • Society Publications
    • Antibody News
    • Antibody therapeutics approved or in regulatory review in the EU or US
      • Antibody therapeutics product data
    • Antibodies in late-stage clinical studies
    • Research Resources
    • Education Resources
  • Career Center
    • Career Shorts
  • Learning Center
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Snakebite antivenoms: Global challenges and progress toward recombinant antibody therapeutics
    • Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoires
    • Antibody Discovery & Development
    • Commercializing Antibody Therapeutics
    • Antibodies to Watch
    • Antibody Validation
      • 4th International Antibody Validation Meeting, Sep 2023
You are here: Home / Archives for Development metrics

The Antibody Society at Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics 2018

December 15, 2018 by Mini

The Antibody Society held its 2018 annual meeting at Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics in San Diego on December 9-13. It was a a great opportunity for the board members and volunteers to meet our society members and provide updates on Society initiatives.

Informative keynote addresses were given by Prof. Andreas Plückthun (University of Zurich), Prof. David Baker (University of Washington), Prof. Rachael Clark (Harvard Medical School) and Dr. Badrul Chowdhury (Medimmune).

One of the highlights of the conference was the Antibodies to Watch in 2019 presentation by Dr. Janice Reichert (Executive Director of TAbS and Editor-in-Chief of mAbs).


The ‘Antibodies to watch in 2019’ paper is currently online in the accepted (manuscript) form. Society members will be informed when the final article, which will be open access, is available.

The Antibody Society booth at Antibody Engineering &Therapeutics

Filed Under: Antibody therapeutics pipeline, Development metrics, Meetings, The Antibody Society, Uncategorized Tagged With: antibody engineering, antibody therapeutics, The Antibody Society

Increased clinical pipeline of Antibody Drug Conjugates in 2016

January 25, 2017 by Joost Melis

The antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) clinical pipeline has continued to grow in 2016. Last month two ADCs entered the clinic: Genmab’s MMAE-conjugated HuMax-AXL-ADC is now in Phase 1/2 development for five different types of solid tumors (ovary, cervix, endometrium, lung and thyroid). Additionally, a PBD-conjugated ADC for multiple myeloma (SGN-CD352A), was added to Seattle Genetics’ clinical pipeline.

In total, 32 clinical trials involving ADCs were initiated in 2016 and a significant progression of the pipeline into Phase 2 and 3 clinical trial was observed that year. During last year, 14 novel ADCs entered Phase 1, now totaling 37 Phase 1 ADCs. Three ADCs initiated Phase 1/2 development in 2016, increasing the total number of ADCs in this stage to 8. Four ADCs (AGS-16C3F, Anetumab Ravtansine, SAR566658, Rova-T) progressed towards Phase 2 (11 ADCs are now in Phase 2) and two drugs (IMGN853, SGN-CD33A) entered Phase 3 trials, doubling the number of ADCs in this clinical phase.

This year, a market approval could become a reality for inotuzumab ozogamicin. Currently, a marketing authorization application for acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) is being reviewed by EMA. Another possible approval is the re-approval for Mylotarg using a different dosing regimen.

Filed Under: ADC, Clinical pipeline, Development metrics, European Medicines Agency, Food and Drug Administration

Antibodies to watch in 2016: Mid-year update

August 18, 2016 by Janice Reichert

mabs-coverSince 2010, the “Antibodies to watch” article series has documented annually the number and identities of commercially sponsored antibody therapeutics in Phase 3 studies, regulatory review and those recently approved in the US and EU. Taken together, the articles have captured the extraordinary doubling of the number of antibody therapeutics in Phase 3 studies from 26 to 53, as identified in the “Antibodies to watch in 2010” and “Antibodies to watch in 2016” articles, respectively. Due to the highly dynamic nature of antibody therapeutics development, numerous transitions have occurred during 2016, and the Society offers here a mid-year update to data reported in the “Antibodies to watch in 2016” article.

As described in our previous posts, 4 antibody therapeutics (atezolizumab, reslizumab, ixekizumab, obiltoxaximab) were granted first marketing authorizations in either the US or EU during January to June 2016. As of mid-2016, marketing applications for 8 antibody therapeutics are being considered for first approvals in the US or EU. Of these, 5 applications (olaratuzumab, bezlotoxumab, sarilumab, brodalumab, ocrelizumab) have Food and Drug Administration action dates during September -December 2016. Recommendations by the European Medicines Agency on applications for Xilonix and inotuzumab ozogamicin could be made in 2016, but additional time would be needed for the European Commission’s decision regarding whether to grant the marketing authorization. It thus remains to be seen whether the number of antibody therapeutics approved in the US or EU during 2016 will match or exceed the record of 9 approvals granted in a single year set in 2015.

As of mid-2016, 53 unique antibody therapeutics were in Phase 3 studies. This is the same total number noted in the “Antibodies to watch in 2016” article, but the antibodies included in the totals are not all the same. The tables included in this mid-year update result from the addition of antibodies that started a first Phase 3 study in late 2015 to mid-2016, and deletion of antibodies that transitioned to regulatory review, reverted to an earlier clinical phase or had their development suspended or terminated. Compared to the totals included in the “Antibodies to watch in 2016” article, the number of antibodies in Phase 3 studies for cancer indications as of mid-2016 decreased slightly (from 17 to 15, respectively), while those for non-cancer indications increased slightly (from 36 to 38, respectively).

Antibodies for cancer represent only 28% of the current commercial Phase 3 pipeline, although they are ~55% of the overall clinical pipeline of therapeutic antibodies. The 15 antibody therapeutics in Phase 3 studies for cancer indications are notable for the diversity in their composition. Of the 15, 6 (40%) are non-canonical antibodies (1 radiolabeled antibody, 1 scFv-containing liposome, 2 immunotoxins, 2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)), and a majority of the canonical antibodies (i.e., full-length IgG1, 2 or 4) are Fc- or glyco-engineered to enhance functionality. The 2 ADCs now in Phase 3 studies represent a vanguard, as this type of antibody therapeutic has entered clinical studies in large numbers only recently. Of the ADCs currently in clinical studies, most (44/56, 79%) are in either Phase 1 or Phase 1/2 studies, and most (55/56) are for cancer indications. ADCs now comprise ~20% of the clinical pipeline of antibodies for cancer, but ~11% of all antibodies in clinical development. There is substantial diversity of the targets, drugs, linkers, and drug-to-antibody ratios of the ADCs in the clinic. For example, of the ADCs in the clinic, targets for 51 have been disclosed, and 39 of these 51 targets are unique, i.e., only one ADC in clinical studies is known to target that particular antigen. Antigens known to be the target of more than one ADC in clinical studies include CD19, CD37, EGFR, HER2 and mesothelin. The diversity of the molecules may initially serve as a hindrance, but knowledge gained by the development of this class of molecules should increase overall as more ADCs enter clinical studies, transition through the phases and join the two ADCs currently on the market, brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris®) and ado-trastuzumab vedotin (Kadcyla®).

Antibodies for non-cancer indications dominate the current commercial Phase 3 pipeline. Unlike the antibodies for cancer, the 38 antibodies in Phase 3 studies for non-cancer indications are mostly canonical full-length IgG1, 2 or 4 molecules. Only 4 of the 38 (~11%) are non-canonical molecules: 1 bispecific antibody and 3 antibody ‘fragments’ (scFv, Fab, nanobody). Like ADCs, bispecific antibodies are expected to comprise a larger percentage of the Phase 3 pipeline in the next ~6-8 years. Bispecific antibodies now comprise ~9% of the entire commercial pipeline of antibody therapeutics, but most (32/45, 71%) of those are currently in early clinical studies (either Phase 1 or Phase 1/2). Compared to ADCs, bispecific antibodies are undergoing evaluation in a broader range of indications, although the majority of bispecifics (30/45, 67%) are for cancer and they comprise ~11% of the clinical pipeline of antibodies for cancer. The two bispecific antibodies now on the market, catumaxomab (Removab®) and blinatumomab (BLINCYTO®), are both for cancer. Nevertheless, the one bispecific antibody now in Phase 3 studies, emicizumab, is for a non-cancer indication (hemophilia A).

The clinical pipeline of antibody therapeutics, including at Phase 3, is highly dynamic. The Antibody Society will continue to track antibodies in the clinic, and report progress to its members.

Acknowledgements: The Antibody Society thanks Hanson Wade for access to the Beacon ADC database.

Like this post? Please become a member!

Filed Under: Clinical pipeline, Development metrics, European Medicines Agency, Food and Drug Administration, Phase 3 pipeline Tagged With: ADC, Antibody drug conjugates, antibody therapeutics, bispecific, clinical pipeline

Antibody immune checkpoint modulators in the clinic

May 5, 2016 by Janice Reichert

Antibody impressionThe possibility of using antibody therapeutics to modulate immune checkpoint pathways has captured the attention of many organizations involved in the research and development of cancer drugs. As of early May 2016, three antibody checkpoint inhibitors (ipilimumab / Yervoy®, pembrolizumab / Keytruda® and nivolumab / Opdivo®) have been approved for marketing, and one (atezolizumab) is undergoing regulatory review. In 2011, ipilimumab, which targets CTLA-4, became the first antibody of this class to be approved. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab, which target PD1, were subsequently granted first approvals in 2014. These drugs are currently marketed as treatments for melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but they have also undergone evaluation as treatments for other cancers, e.g., head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. A marketing application for the use of anti-PD-L1 atezolizumab as a treatment for urothelial carcinoma is undergoing a priority review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and a regulatory action is expected in September 2016. An FDA action on a second application for use of atezolizumab as a treatment for NSCLC is expected in October 2016.

The biology of immune checkpoint pathways is complicated, and the use of antibodies to modulate numerous immune checkpoint targets is being explored. At least 45 antibody checkpoint modulators are currently undergoing evaluation in clinical studies of patients with a variety of cancers. In addition to CTLA-4, PD1 and PD-L1, other targets for antibodies in the clinic include B7-H3, CD70, CD40, CD137, GITR, OX40, KIR, LAG-3 and TIM3. Antibodies that modulate immune checkpoints are now ~16% of the entire clinical pipeline of antibodies for cancer, but most (~80%) are in early stage (i.e., Phase 1 or 1/2) clinical studies. First-in-human studies for over 20 antibody checkpoint modulators were initiated in 2015, and given the intense interest in the topic, many more are expected to enter clinical studies in the near future. Much work remains to be done, however, to demonstrate the relevance of some targets, and to determine suitable treatment regimens, especially when the antibody is administered as part of combination therapy.  If the potential of this class of molecules is realized, unmet medical need could be reduced, and patients’ choice of antibody therapeutics could substantially increase, in the next 5-10 years.

Filed Under: Clinical pipeline, Development metrics

How long does anti-cancer antibody development take?

April 19, 2016 by Janice Reichert

mabs-coverA total of 15 antibody therapeutics were granted a first approval in the US during 2014-2015. Approximately half (53%) of these products were approved as treatments for cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (necitumumab, nivolumab), melanoma (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), gastric cancer (ramucirumab), multiple myeloma (daratumumab, elotuzumab), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (blinatumomab) and neuroblastoma (dinutuximab). To aid development planning, we determined the mean and median elapsed time from entry into clinical study to first US approval for 7 of these 8 products. Dinutuximab was excluded because a substantial amount of the development was done by government or non-profit organizations. The mean (median) development time for the 7 products was 8.6 (8.9) years. The product with the shortest development time (4.6 years) was pembrolizumab (Keytruda®), which was the first approved antibody that targets the immune checkpoint PD-1. Pembrolizumab had FDA’s breakthrough therapy designation and orphan product designation, and its marketing application received a priority review and accelerated approval. The accelerated approval program allows FDA to approve a drug that treats a serious or life-threatening disease based on clinical data showing the drug has an effect on a surrogate endpoint reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit to patients, but confirmatory clinical trials must be conducted after approval.
Like this post? Please become a member!

Filed Under: Development metrics Tagged With: antibody therapeutics, cancer

mabs

mabs

The Official Journal of The Antibody Society

Career Center

Our Career Center is a premier resource to connect highly qualified talent with matching career opportunities. Visit for details on over 800 jobs!

AIRR Community

AIRR Community

The Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoire Community is a research-driven group organizing around the use of high-throughput sequencing technologies to study antibody/B-cell and T-cell receptor repertoires.

Recent Posts

  • World Cancer Day 2024 – Antibody therapeutics for cancer indications February 5, 2024
  • The Antibody Society is hiring! January 23, 2024
  • The Antibody Society announces the election of new Directors and Officers January 19, 2024

Archives

Follow us online

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Home
  • Privacy & Terms of Use
  • About
  • Directors and Officers
  • Advisors
  • Sponsors & Partners
  • Mission & Activities
  • Join the Society
  • Membership Levels
  • Members only
  • Login
  • Antibody therapeutics approved or in regulatory review in the EU or US
  • Meeting reports
  • Presentations
  • Contact

©2015 - scicomvisuals